At the start of the article the Oren talks about how Roger Ebert said that better luck tomorrow was a “film mostly populated by Asian Americans actors that isn’t about Asian Americanness.” I agree and disagree with this statement, because yes the whole plot line could have been a situation that happened to any race of people. But there were areas of the film where Asian identity played a role. For example when they went to the party and got into the fight, and when they were driving and the car next to them was treating them with their guns. Throughout the class this year we have disused how the Asian identity has been constructed I think the movie was a point of deconstruction, the director deconstruction some of the myth of model minority. The movie proved that Asians can also be deviant just like anyone else.
Oren talks about Tak Toyoshima who is a Asian American comic strip writer. Oren says that Toyoshima’s work is a “ bridging text” because he says the majority of the readers are not Asian. While reading the article I thought the comic was bridging because its was not really focused on Asians but there were Asians in the comic strip, sort of like better luck tomorrow. But after looking at the comics that were in the article I don’t know how it was a bridging text. I felt that the comics reinforced cretin stereotypes. The one that I found the most interesting was the one with the white and black guy who get the girl, while SAM only shakes her hand. To me I found this cartoon as a further construction of the Asian identity, even if Toyoshima was being sarcastic.